Neoliberal Fundamentalism

Sometimes I feel like a lone voice in the wilderness – we need an alternative to neoliberal economics – then every so often there’s words of support.

We might reflect on how we enable corporations to play stealth games with our expectations. While consumer activism has undoubtedly brought about some limited good in relation to environmental and trade justice concerns, sometimes change itself seems to have dwindled into a set of consumer choices whereby fairness, for instance, is just another “option”. Starbucks’ conscience-soothing “fair trade” range invited the question of whether everything else it – and others with similar options – had on offer was tacitly unfair trade. While there is a real debate to be had about whether consumer campaigning for “fair”, “green” and “local” choices offers limited or substantive change, the truth is we have lost the ability to imagine economic alternatives to neoliberal fundamentalism. The more the focus remains exclusively on market excesses and abuses, the less we think about the inbuilt flaws of corporate globalisation.

Of course, when dissident alternatives enter the discussion from areas such as Brazil and Venezuela, where there have been concerted efforts to reclaim the local from private corporations, they too are subject to rebranding as “lost regions”, troublespots that threaten the stability of the world mocha order. Conversely, there is admiration for India or China when the local is appropriated, privatised and patented, actions that have worse consequences for the vegetable-cart vendor and small farmer than for coffee shops and bakeries in affluent countries. As long as we place our resolute faith in a global economic system that has shown itself to be rickety and ruthless, we remain susceptible to believing “the world is flat”, a world where, Thomas Friedman notes happily, our “choices get reduced to Pepsi or Coke – to slight nuances of taste, slight nuances of policy, slight alterations in design”. Is another world still possible? Priyamvada Gopal, The Guardian.

Instead of the left-wing politicians arguing over how much public services should be cut – we should be discussing – neoliberalism what’s the alternative – nothing else we give us success.

Mercury Nominations

Bat for Lashes – Two Suns
Florence and the Machine – Lungs
Friendly Fires – Friendly Fires
Glasvegas – Glasvegas
The Horrors – Primary Colours
The Invisible – The Invisible
Kasabian – West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum
LA Roux – LA Roux
Led Bib – Sensible Shoes
Lisa Hannigan – Sea Sew
Speech Debelle – Speech Therapy
Sweet Billy Pilgrim – Twice Born Men

Source: BBC.

Well I’ve only listened seriously to two of these albums Glasvegas and Friendly Fires and if forced to choose I’d go for Friendly Fires.

Tell Us Something We Don’t Know

Top professions such as medicine and law are increasingly being closed off to all but the most affluent families, a report into social mobility has said.

Former minister Alan Milburn has chaired a study for the prime minister on widening access to high-status jobs.
The report warns that people entering careers such as medicine, law and journalism are increasingly likely to be from more affluent families.

Currently 75% of judges and 45% of senior civil servants are privately educated.

The report does not only focus on the poorest part of the population – but suggests that many middle-income families are also missing out in an increasingly polarised jobs market. BBC.

As I said tell us something we don’t know.

Swine Flu

I’ve not talked about swine flu much but isn’t their a load of rubbish written – here’s just one example

Schools across Britain have now broken up for summer holidays, and experts hope this will help to slow the spread of the virus. But there are fears that when classes resume in the autumn the number of cases will increase rapidly.

School closures would cause serious difficulties for working parents, lead to a 1% loss in GDP through absenteeism and see as many as 30% of NHS staff having to take time off just when they are needed to treat growing numbers of patients.

In a study published in the today Lancet, Government adviser Professor Neil Ferguson and Dr Simon Cauchemez, both of the department of infectious disease epidemiology, Imperial College London, said “prolonged” closures could reduce the scale of the outbreak by 13-17% and at the pandemic’s peak shutting schools could bring down the number of cases by 38-45%.

“It is therefore hoped that closure of schools during the pandemic might break the chains of transmission, with the following potential benefits: reducing the total number of cases; slowing the epidemic to give more time for vaccine production; and reducing the incidence of cases at the peak of the epidemic, limiting both the stress on healthcare systems and peak absenteeism in the general population, and thus increasing community-wide resilience,” the researchers said.

Such a move would also raise the question of what should be done with millions of schoolchildren during a prolonged shutdown, they added. The authors said that governments in Europe and North America might have to take such a step after they studied the impact of school closures during flu epidemics in other countries stretching back to 1918.

They say that study of the 1918 flu outbreak in America and Australia indicates that shutting schools, in tandem with closing churches and improved hygiene, could have reduced the death toll by between 10% and 30%, and as much as 50% in some cities at the height of the outbreak. Denis Campbell and Polly Curtis, The Guardian.

What has 1918 got to do with today, back then if you closed a school children would pretty much stay at home or at least within their immediate local area. In 2009 what do people do with their leisure time? As unexciting as it might sound they drive to a large out-of-town shopping centre where they’ll mix with a completely different set of people – surely this increases the chances of infection – I conclude the report has serious flaws.

I would like to read the report to check my argument – however The Lancet wants $31.50 (I have no idea why the price is in dollars) – which is money I haven’t got.

Food Waste It’s Killing Us

For most of us, food shopping involves the local supermarket and in that respect Tristram Stuart isn’t any different, except you won’t find Stuart at the checkout instead he’ll be round the back rummaging through the supermarkets bins for his food. Stuart is one of a growing band of freegans who protest against global waste – Stuart’s got a point about waste:

Most people would admit that wasting food is not good. But surely, they’d say, the problem can’t be that serious? Isn’t rooting around in rubbish bins a somewhat extreme – and unpleasant – reaction? Stuart would disagree. In his new book, Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal, he sets out in forensic detail exactly why we should all be worried by the problem. In his view, food waste is the big unspoken environmental crisis of our times, right up there with more familiar concerns such as deforestation, water scarcity, even global warming.

Addressing food waste, he says, is a vital step when it comes to sorting out many of these other problems, and it’s hard to disagree with his logic. If we waste less food, we’ll need less land to grow it on, and hence will cut down fewer trees; we’ll use less water to irrigate that land and less carbon to transport and process the food it produces. On a more basic level, food waste is an issue of equality. If we didn’t waste so much food, there would be more available, which means fewer people in the world would go hungry.

Much of the evidence that Waste uncovers is startling. In Britain, we are remarkably profligate with our food. Most of us are probably used to laughing about our personal failings – that packet of pre-washed lettuce turned to mulch in the fridge, that half-eaten loaf gone mouldy in the bread bin. But when such individual wastefulness is aggregated, the figures become less amusing. A 2008 survey by the waste organisation Wrap, based on studying a sample of household bins, found that we collectively throw away 6.7m tonnes of food each year. (Stuart, in fact, says that the Wrap figure is too high, because it includes things like orange peel, but his estimate for “avoidable food waste” is still 5.4m tonnes.)

An easier way to get a handle on this is to think in terms of individual items. As a nation, we chuck away 484m unopened yoghurt pots each year, 1.6bn untouched apples (or 27 per person) and 2.6bn slices of bread. That doesn’t even include the food we waste at work or leave on our plates in canteens and restaurants. All in all, we chuck away roughly a quarter of the food we buy.

What many of us don’t properly realise is that this consumer waste represents just the tip of the iceberg. Although individuals contribute a massive amount to food waste, even more occurs further back along the supply chain. A huge amount is wasted during or immediately after harvesting, especially in developing countries, where poor transport and other infrastructure mean that food often perishes before it gets to market.

Then there are the unwieldy and complex workings of the global supply system: to get from its source to our plates, much of the food we eat undertakes a journey of epic proportions, involving carts, ships, planes and lorries, warehouses, processing plants and supermarket distribution centres. At each stage of this journey – inevitably, perhaps – a proportion gets wasted. When all this is added together, Stuart says, it is possible to estimate that more than a third of global food supplies is wasted (with the proportion in rich countries being as much as 50%). At the same time, nearly a billion people on the planet live close to starvation. William Skidelsky, The Observer.

See food waste is killing us – still I couldn’t rummage through the bins like Stuart.

No, No, No, No

Private schools offering lavish extracurricular activities give their pupils an unfair advantage and should be forced to share their facilities with state pupils, says a report commissioned by the prime minister.

Former cabinet minister Alan Milburn was asked to look at how class barriers could be broken down in Britain and found that middle-class children whose parents do not move in the “right” circles, as well as those from poorer families, now risk being shut out of professions that have become more socially exclusive.

Milburn says that fee-paying pupils benefit from an emphasis on “soft skills” such as teamwork and communication, which are imparted through sport, music and drama. With more pupils now getting the academic grades needed for university, private pupils get ahead because of their more rounded CVs and confident presentation.

The report calls on the Charity Commission to force schools to share extracurricular activities with state school pupils as a condition of maintaining their charitable status, and for Ofsted to inspect state schools on their provision of extras such as music and drama to ensure they become a priority. Gaby Hinsliff, The Observer.

No, no, no, no the answer is that private schools aren’t charities – there is nothing charitable about educating wealth children – this is a loophole that should be closed now – there is no sensible reason on earth why taxpayers should subsidise the rich. And I wonder how many parents would continue to send there children to private schools if they had to bear the full cost? Quite a few I suggest.

Kill the Poor

Patients should be charged £20 to see a GP in a bid to limit demands placed on the health service, a centre-right think-tank says.

The Social Market Foundation said forcing people to pay a fee for an appointment could help the NHS cope in the tight financial times ahead. BBC.

Since when did charging people to see a doctor become a centre-right policy? This is pure right-wing thinking, the founding principal of the National Health Service ha always been “free at the point of use” and this has been accepted by all governments left and right since it was set up in 1948. The only thing this policy will do is kill those who are too poor to pay – maybe that’s the aim – market forces at work.

You know I’m absolutely fed up with the articles which constantly harp on about cuts in public services. What we should be talking about is how to achieve economic growth because that’s the way debts really get paid – no one wants to see the decades of stagnation that is currently bedevilling the Japanese economy.

Scott-Free

Major companies which set up and funded a secret blacklist to deny work to thousands of trade unionists will escape prosecution.

A judge fined a private investigator who operated the covert blacklist but said he was not the only person responsible but was financed by big “high street” companies. Major firms in the construction industry will be officially warned that they will be prosecuted if they set up a new blacklist.

Affected trade unionists said they were disappointed that companies which had wrecked workers’ lives had appeared to get away with it. They angrily confronted the private investigator, Ian Kerr, who hid his face as he was driven away.

Kerr, 66, was fined £5,000 at Knutsford crown court, Cheshire after admitting keeping a clandestine database of 3,000 workers for the past 15 years.

The court heard that more than 40 construction companies had given £600,000 in the past five years to Kerr’s agency to record personal and employment details of allegedly troublesome workers.

About 90% of the information came from the companies so that it could be shared with other firms to vet workers before they were employed. The firms include Balfour Beatty, Sir Robert McAlpine, Costain and Laing O’Rourke. Rob Evans, The Guardian.

So that’s it firms get off Scott-free – British law what an absolute farce.

Half-million Pound Salary

The Olympic Delivery Authority was forced to write off millions spent developing a media centre and the Olympic village after it failed to attract private investment, while performance-related payments to construction consultants have quadrupled in the past year.

Annual accounts published yesterday show that payments to CLM, a consortium of companies created to act as the ODA’s delivery partner, have almost doubled as construction has gathered pace.

The ODA paid £151.6m to CLM in the year to 31 March 2009, including £60.2m in performance-related payments. The previous year it received £16.1m in bonuses as part of an overall bill of £87.6m.

Chairman John Armitt was paid £250,000 and claimed expenses of £11,562, while chief executive David Higgins was paid a total of £537,000 and claimed £6,723 in expenses. Director of construction Howard Shiplee was paid £362,000 and received £19,344 in expenses. Owen Gibson, The Guardian.

What on earth do these people do that justifies such a salary from the taxpayers purse?

Allied Carpets in Administration

Allied Carpets has gone into administration, as the stagnating housing market led to a fall in demand for carpets and flooring.

But 51 of its 217 stores and its insurance business have been sold immediately, saving 400 jobs, administrator BDO Stoy Hayward said. BBC.

Immediately sold to who? And was that really the best price? I smell a rat, but then that’s how businesses operate – no morals – I doubt this is any different other bankruptcy. Retail Week reports:

Allied Carpet Properties has been placed into administration, and 51 of its stores have been immediately sold to Allied Carpets Retail.

BDO Stoy Hayward has been appointed administrator today to Allied Carpet Properties. After the appointment, the 51 stores and Allied Carpets’ insurance inspection business were sold to Allied Carpets Retail. The disposal protects around 400 jobs.

It is hoped some additional stores will also be acquired by the new business over the next two weeks, subject to ongoing negotiations with existing landlords. Jennifer Creevy, Retail Week.

So Allied Carpet Properties goes bust and Allied Carpet Retail buys 51 stores, the rat gets smellier.

A few weeks ago the FT reported:

Allied Carpets, the retailer owned by retail debt specialist Hilco, is set to place the division that owns its stores into administration as part of a wider plan to restructure the business.

The move could see a large number of the 218 store portfolio used to sell its carpets closed and returned empty to landlords.

Allied has filed a notice of intention to appoint administrators to its property division, which holds the leases to its stores. BDO Stoy Hayward is expected to be appointed to oversee the administration of the division, which is making a loss of about £2m a month.

BDO confirmed the submission of the paperwork but declined to comment further until formally appointed. Hilco owns Allied Carpets through an offshore fund called Sigma Capital. It declined to comment on Thursday.

The move is part of the refinancing and restructuring of the wider Allied Carpets business, which is set to be finalised in the next week according to a person familiar with situation. The source added that he expected a “core and substantial number of stores will continue to trade”.

Landlords are worried that the move could be a precursor to the dumping of the leases of non-performing stores. MFI followed a similar strategy last year when it placed MFI properties into administration. Daniel Thomas and Anousha Sakoui, FT.

Yes one very smelly rat – as always the real losers are employees who’ve lost their jobs and those who keep their jobs will find their pensions severely eroded – the directors are sitting pretty though.