<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 357 Loonies and Counting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outofrange.net/2009/10/21/357-loonies-and-counting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2009/10/21/357-loonies-and-counting/</link>
	<description>The mistakes of each generation will just fade like a radio station if you drive out of range - Ani DiFranco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanners</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2009/10/21/357-loonies-and-counting/comment-page-1/#comment-3719</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=10870#comment-3719</guid>
		<description>Lunatics.  Yup, that&#039;s what anyone who dares doubt the &#039;concensus&#039; is called.  I guess if we are going with the theory that if told often enough that something is true and we shouldn&#039;t question it, we should just believe, surely this subject now falls under the category of faith, not science.  In which case I&#039;m getting my uneducated-non-scientific ass down to church to pray for my eternal soul.  Same reasoning as climate-scarers.  I have just had a &#039;discussion&#039; with someone calling themselves a scientist elsewhere, and when i posed a series of fair questions, I was told that I wasn&#039;t able to understand.  Standard response - why not try explaining to me instead of patronising and then dismissing me. 
This whole malarkey may be true, but the fact that this has become a politicised ideology which cannot and must not be questioned makes me want to scream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lunatics.  Yup, that&#8217;s what anyone who dares doubt the &#8216;concensus&#8217; is called.  I guess if we are going with the theory that if told often enough that something is true and we shouldn&#8217;t question it, we should just believe, surely this subject now falls under the category of faith, not science.  In which case I&#8217;m getting my uneducated-non-scientific ass down to church to pray for my eternal soul.  Same reasoning as climate-scarers.  I have just had a &#8216;discussion&#8217; with someone calling themselves a scientist elsewhere, and when i posed a series of fair questions, I was told that I wasn&#8217;t able to understand.  Standard response &#8211; why not try explaining to me instead of patronising and then dismissing me.<br />
This whole malarkey may be true, but the fact that this has become a politicised ideology which cannot and must not be questioned makes me want to scream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
