<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OutofRange.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outofrange.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outofrange.net</link>
	<description>The mistakes of each generation will just fade like a radio station if you drive out of range - Ani DiFranco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New Tory Poster &#8211; New Spoofs by AshleyL</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/02/16/new-tory-poster-new-spoofs/comment-page-1/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>AshleyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11327#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>New here,

I&#039;m from Canada :) and I think I found a new place to hang

So, what&#039;s everyone think about the Olympics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New here,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m from Canada <img src='http://www.outofrange.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and I think I found a new place to hang</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s everyone think about the Olympics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Tory Poster – More Laughs by OldrockerBR</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/02/12/new-tory-poster-%e2%80%93-more-laughs/comment-page-1/#comment-3863</link>
		<dc:creator>OldrockerBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11304#comment-3863</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Please update new address for PHROCK Blog in your bloglist:

http://phrockblog1.blogspot.com

Thanks a lot!

OldrockerBR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Please update new address for PHROCK Blog in your bloglist:</p>
<p><a href="http://phrockblog1.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://phrockblog1.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
<p>OldrockerBR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guardian Reader’s are Bigoted Sexists Too by Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/01/24/guardian-reader%e2%80%99s-are-bigoted-sexists-too/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11198#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know anyone who thinks this way. I avoid the Daily Mail (Daily Misogynist) because of views like this too. I had thought the Guardian was supposed to be better. Why are all these men assuming sex is only for their benefit?! Are there no women quoted who actually enjoy sex? Obviously I&#039;m talking of within relationships, not prostitution. There is a big difference between the two. I can&#039;t believe these were the letters they chose to publish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anyone who thinks this way. I avoid the Daily Mail (Daily Misogynist) because of views like this too. I had thought the Guardian was supposed to be better. Why are all these men assuming sex is only for their benefit?! Are there no women quoted who actually enjoy sex? Obviously I&#8217;m talking of within relationships, not prostitution. There is a big difference between the two. I can&#8217;t believe these were the letters they chose to publish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Cigarettes by Dawn smokeless cigarettes</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/01/20/e-cigarettes-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn smokeless cigarettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11174#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>You still can not argue that electronic cigarettes are not a better alternative for the current smoker that does not want to quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still can not argue that electronic cigarettes are not a better alternative for the current smoker that does not want to quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rmott62 by rmott</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/01/15/rmott62/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>rmott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11152#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much, it is much easier to imagine the gloss of the world of Belle du Jour, than reading the abuse of human rights that is prostitution for the majority.
I so grateful you wrote about my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much, it is much easier to imagine the gloss of the world of Belle du Jour, than reading the abuse of human rights that is prostitution for the majority.<br />
I so grateful you wrote about my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Virgin Media Email Downgrade by Alex Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/01/05/virgin-media-email-downgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11122#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>Hi

The mail is on the same platform as Gmail, where such attachments are not permitted - wholly because they&#039;re widely used to embed viruses in them, this is all about safety.

In this day and age there are much better ways to distribute files anyway, but either way this is about protecting users from the nasties that are out there on the web.

Hope this makes sense.

Alex

Internet Product Management
Virgin Media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>The mail is on the same platform as Gmail, where such attachments are not permitted &#8211; wholly because they&#8217;re widely used to embed viruses in them, this is all about safety.</p>
<p>In this day and age there are much better ways to distribute files anyway, but either way this is about protecting users from the nasties that are out there on the web.</p>
<p>Hope this makes sense.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
<p>Internet Product Management<br />
Virgin Media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CD&#8217;s of 2009 by your wife</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2010/01/05/cds-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>your wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11109#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>some odd choices in particular Day One , why????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some odd choices in particular Day One , why????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing the Truth is not a Defence against Libel by Jerry Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2009/04/02/publishing-the-truth-is-not-a-defence-against-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=9704#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>&quot;The mistakes of each generation will just fade like a radio station if you drive out of range – Ani DiFranco&quot;

This quote, which serves as your website&#039;s subtitle, is not commonly true. It would be more accurate and instructive to consider each generation&#039;s mistakes as being the foundation on which the edifice of later generations is built. Most of the time it is not possible to &quot;move out of range&quot; of the consequences of a generation&#039;s big mistakes, any more than you can evade the consequences of a faulty foundation by going to a higher floor of the building.

Sometimes you just have to tear the building down and rebuild. No matter what the cost of demolition and reconstruction might be, they will be less severe than living in a faulty building when the cracks in the foundation bring the building crashing down with all the people caught in the collapse, by surprise, unprepared and unprotected.

And if the original problem had been the greediness of scamming building contractors, be very wary, lest they take you for a sucker again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The mistakes of each generation will just fade like a radio station if you drive out of range – Ani DiFranco&#8221;</p>
<p>This quote, which serves as your website&#8217;s subtitle, is not commonly true. It would be more accurate and instructive to consider each generation&#8217;s mistakes as being the foundation on which the edifice of later generations is built. Most of the time it is not possible to &#8220;move out of range&#8221; of the consequences of a generation&#8217;s big mistakes, any more than you can evade the consequences of a faulty foundation by going to a higher floor of the building.</p>
<p>Sometimes you just have to tear the building down and rebuild. No matter what the cost of demolition and reconstruction might be, they will be less severe than living in a faulty building when the cracks in the foundation bring the building crashing down with all the people caught in the collapse, by surprise, unprepared and unprotected.</p>
<p>And if the original problem had been the greediness of scamming building contractors, be very wary, lest they take you for a sucker again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing the Truth is not a Defence against Libel by Jerry Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2009/04/02/publishing-the-truth-is-not-a-defence-against-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=9704#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>Most of the &quot;truth is not a defense&quot; laws in UK, Europe, and Canada were created by legislators under pressure from Jewish groups. The intent of these laws is to make it dangerous for a conscientious individual to raise an alarm when he notices that a protected group is abusing their protections in order to work mischief. If the individual gives the alarm, he may be telling the truth, but he will be exposing the mischief-makers to possible reprisals.

So, in a sense, these laws are quite similar to what you&#039;d expect if, say, thieving gangs were in (direct or indirect) control of law-making. They&#039;d surely find it to their advantage for people in general to risk legal punishments if they were so bold as to fight for their right to the possession of their own property, or if they were to commit the offensive (to thieves) act of raising a hue and cry over who the thieves are and what the thieves were doing.

But that is what happened. That is what the Jews have done. They are wrecking your country with immigration laws that do not impose reasonable quality standards on the immigrants. They are wrecking your country by making it blind to any enemy, or to any peril which they do not choose to reveal to the public with the media, which is under their control. And foremost among the enemies which they wish to keep hidden is themselves. So they have made it illegal to tell the truth, when the truth is adverse to their interests, by declaring such truths to be Hate Propaganda.

The United States, where I live, is not yet quite so corrupt that I can be arrested for telling antisemitic truths. Here, I&#039;m still free (as yet) to declare that an antisemite is simply someone who knows what&#039;s going on. I can point out that the Jews cry out in pain as they attack you, and that their cries find sympathetic ears among people who do NOT know what is going on. I can tell you that Ernst Zundel was in the right in almost every particular of his case against the Jewish Holocaust minions, who, in order to suppress Zundel, invoked that very same &quot;truth is not a defence&quot; legal dogma that so afflicts your country.

You and your people, and their country, are not merely under attack -- though it would not be incorrect to say that you are being attacked. It&#039;s worse. Your enemy has conquered you. You are living under occupation, having to deal with outrageous laws issued by the occupying power. Your democratic processes are mere window dressing, your permitted public discourses mere exercises in mass deception. You&#039;re trying to raise an alarm after your side has been defeated. You can&#039;t win by playing the games your enemy will allow you to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the &#8220;truth is not a defense&#8221; laws in UK, Europe, and Canada were created by legislators under pressure from Jewish groups. The intent of these laws is to make it dangerous for a conscientious individual to raise an alarm when he notices that a protected group is abusing their protections in order to work mischief. If the individual gives the alarm, he may be telling the truth, but he will be exposing the mischief-makers to possible reprisals.</p>
<p>So, in a sense, these laws are quite similar to what you&#8217;d expect if, say, thieving gangs were in (direct or indirect) control of law-making. They&#8217;d surely find it to their advantage for people in general to risk legal punishments if they were so bold as to fight for their right to the possession of their own property, or if they were to commit the offensive (to thieves) act of raising a hue and cry over who the thieves are and what the thieves were doing.</p>
<p>But that is what happened. That is what the Jews have done. They are wrecking your country with immigration laws that do not impose reasonable quality standards on the immigrants. They are wrecking your country by making it blind to any enemy, or to any peril which they do not choose to reveal to the public with the media, which is under their control. And foremost among the enemies which they wish to keep hidden is themselves. So they have made it illegal to tell the truth, when the truth is adverse to their interests, by declaring such truths to be Hate Propaganda.</p>
<p>The United States, where I live, is not yet quite so corrupt that I can be arrested for telling antisemitic truths. Here, I&#8217;m still free (as yet) to declare that an antisemite is simply someone who knows what&#8217;s going on. I can point out that the Jews cry out in pain as they attack you, and that their cries find sympathetic ears among people who do NOT know what is going on. I can tell you that Ernst Zundel was in the right in almost every particular of his case against the Jewish Holocaust minions, who, in order to suppress Zundel, invoked that very same &#8220;truth is not a defence&#8221; legal dogma that so afflicts your country.</p>
<p>You and your people, and their country, are not merely under attack &#8212; though it would not be incorrect to say that you are being attacked. It&#8217;s worse. Your enemy has conquered you. You are living under occupation, having to deal with outrageous laws issued by the occupying power. Your democratic processes are mere window dressing, your permitted public discourses mere exercises in mass deception. You&#8217;re trying to raise an alarm after your side has been defeated. You can&#8217;t win by playing the games your enemy will allow you to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best restaurant in Gloucester! by simon</title>
		<link>http://www.outofrange.net/2009/12/05/the-best-restaurant-in-gloucester/comment-page-1/#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outofrange.net/?p=11048#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>OK “T” not one of my clearest posts.
In my opinion Pizza Express has become the best place to eat in Gloucester.
Bearlands is not the place it once was and neither is Cafe Rene. As for Fosters well each to their own - personally it&#039;s little better than a Harvester,  whilst I admit I rather like Prezzo although it does pack the dinners in and as for Vinings I&#039;m not a fan of the all you can eat style of Indian food personally I&#039;d rather eat at Hill Top in Worcester Street far better food.
As for Nando’s you’re welcome to touch it with your barge pole but you wouldn’t catch me dead in such a place.

So perhaps best restaurant was over the top however if I was to eat in Gloucester it would be either Pizza Express or Hill Top.

I have to say I’m looking forward to Kinnaree opening.

However, that still leaves Gloucester lacking any form of decent dining for that I travel to the Bell at Sapperton.

YMMV

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK “T” not one of my clearest posts.<br />
In my opinion Pizza Express has become the best place to eat in Gloucester.<br />
Bearlands is not the place it once was and neither is Cafe Rene. As for Fosters well each to their own &#8211; personally it&#8217;s little better than a Harvester,  whilst I admit I rather like Prezzo although it does pack the dinners in and as for Vinings I&#8217;m not a fan of the all you can eat style of Indian food personally I&#8217;d rather eat at Hill Top in Worcester Street far better food.<br />
As for Nando’s you’re welcome to touch it with your barge pole but you wouldn’t catch me dead in such a place.</p>
<p>So perhaps best restaurant was over the top however if I was to eat in Gloucester it would be either Pizza Express or Hill Top.</p>
<p>I have to say I’m looking forward to Kinnaree opening.</p>
<p>However, that still leaves Gloucester lacking any form of decent dining for that I travel to the Bell at Sapperton.</p>
<p>YMMV</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
